Education provides a universal narrative of hope and progress. Education is, arguably, an innate human aspiration, a human right, and a human responsibility. But this high ideal and today's common reform-resistant «factory» model of schooling are far apart. What to do in a world in which many scenarios for tomorrow are imaginable? A contribution from Trevor Mepham.
Education policy is invariably seen as a closely guarded national, or state affair, on a similar sort of footing to security and defence. And in our times – the first half of the 21st century – the ideals, the practices and the policies that drive education seem to jar with each other and create a troubling dissonance, if not a head-on collision.
It often seems as though education, as legislated by governments, is inappropriately aligned with «silver bullet» notions of economic growth, competition and technological progress, rather than human health and development, human well-being and cooperation, liberty and social justice.
Education, as required by the state, often seems to ape the dynamics of the capitalist system which, itself, seems to function like a model of «evolution by competition». And here, in the 21st century, tidal waves of globalisation lap against every shore, while the background din of uniformity, standardisation and regulation whines in the breeze.
How strange that education has come to be a dwelling place for conservative attitudes in relation to how we envisage a future. The net outcome of this attitudinal stance is that more focus is directed to how we might preserve the past, rather than how we might welcome the future.
Education is afflicted by endless reforms, yet with no significant change in pedagogy. Endless reform, but nothing radical; no root change. The default position over the last few centuries is that those who get the points win the prizes.
The industrial «factory» model of school, with a singular focus on «academic» outputs and unit costs has, in fact, shown great resilience down the years. The currency provided by the data of the PISA league tables continues to hold a high exchange rate, and the summit of learning aspirations remains the «University».
But are we about to witness, or be part of, an inexorable revolution that will have universal implications for society, education, and even the nature of humanity? Will the quickening surge of exponential change, as manifested in synthetic biology, quantum computing and AIs sweep to one side any remaining attempt at «endless reform, no revolution» in different fields of activity, education included?
In the international Waldorf movement for early childhood, school-aged children, and young people, it is only right that we work to keep our house in order, in as much as we can. Because schools are open now! Children go to school to learn today! Teachers are called to work in the present, not all the tomorrows we can imagine, yet may never come.
However, in reflecting on practice, and thinking through the essential characteristics that make a Waldorf school, a Waldorf school, it seems also necessary to hold wider horizons in mind, bearing in mind the scope and scale of the changes and challenges that may lie ahead.
For example, are we soon heading into a post-school future? Will education – curriculum, lessons, timetable, teachers – be replaced by therapy, recovery and «life assistants»? In the coming years, might education have to metamorphose into something akin to primary health care and well-being? Will knowledge and insight into childhood, children and learning simply evaporate from the social discourse, to be replaced by highly personalised learning and well-being algorithms?
Are classroom, teacher and school on the wane, never to return? If curriculum and school subjects are sub-contracted out to devices and AIs, will the programme of learning tilt towards sensory development, speaking & listening, movement – embodiment – nutrition and socialising. After all, if I am soon to have a Personal AI, or a personal PA device, why learn to spell? Or write? Let alone work!
In these days, we are presented with a bewildering mosaic of new and shifting indicators. According to one’s perspective and temperamental dispositions, we are seemingly heading into paradigmatic or apocalyptic change, or both. A few of these arguably, «telling», signs of the times are summarised here:
But, but, but . . .
Do these headlines signpost a dystopian future? Will the actors and agencies be able to agree to come together to crack the dual «containment problem» of climate and technology? Is school, as Alice Cooper (1972), claimed, «out for ever».
Or could it be that these scenarios – bewildering, uncertain and daunting as they may seem – present a golden opportunity to parents, educators, children and young people? When governments and public service providers come calling, will we – members of the Waldorf movement and community – have the imagination, the commitment and the where-with-all to provide a life-enabling approach to care and learning, and to play our parts in realising the task of Waldorf education in the 21st century – an art of education for our times.
On 7th September 1919, at an event to mark the opening of the «Waldorf» School, Steiner gave an address for parents, teachers, and children. In his comments, he laid out the essence of the task: «Science that comes alive! Art that comes alive! Religion that comes alive! In the end, that is what education is.» The work continues.
Trevor Mepham
30th October 2024
Footnotes:
1: Stuart Russell in «The Guardian»
2: Data from ourworldindate.org
3: Report of Save the Children
4: Data from the UK Departement for Education
5: Good Childhood Report for 2022
6. Survey by the National Health Service of Great Britain
7. Goal 4 is a target set by the UN
8. Report of NEU
9. Source of the figures: Euronews/ Agence France Presse (AFP)